Financing Health in Africa - Le blog
  • Home
  • Bloggers
  • Collaborative projects
  • Join our COPs
  • Resources
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Value for Money in the health sector: not just a donor agenda

12/15/2011

9 Commentaires

 
Bruno Meessen

In this blog, Bruno Meessen argues that the ‘value for money’ agenda is also an African one. A key test for Performance-Based Aid schemes will be the extent to which they consolidate reform initiatives already taken at country level.

Over the last 15 days, we have had the opportunity to read two interesting contributions on the progressive shift of the aid agenda towards ‘results for money’.

Let’s start with the most recent one.  On the Broker Online blog, Marcus Leroy, a former technical assistant for the Belgian Cooperation, criticizes the increasing dominance of the “results for money” agenda (and more specifically performance-based aid) in the aid industry.

Leroy’s review of the ‘value for money’ agenda is rich. He first discusses it at a conceptual level and then at the operational level. In this post, I would like to focus on a few points related to the facts (the philosophical and moral issues he identifies I will leave for another blog…). And obviously, given my background, I will stick to the health sector.

First of all, let me be clear that I agree with Mr Leroy on this important point: performance-based aid (PBA) is not without risks. He identifies several of them, some of which were discussed at our last Incentives for Health Provider Performance Network event in May at CERDI in Clermont-Ferrand, France. Presentations there gave us a better understanding of the proposals on the table: some are well advanced (such as the GAVI one), some - maybe the most radical ones -, such as COD Aid or TrAid+ are still under development. All were really interesting. However, the half-day of exchanges also made us realize that PBA will not be the magic bullet that (part of) the aid sector has been in search of for decades.  

Facing the unknown, it’s only natural to feel some fear. PBA is no exception - many of us have fears about the approach. My main concern is that donors will opt for narrow targets within one sector, resulting in few positive spill-over effects across sectors and the whole local society. Worse, an incentive scheme focusing on just one health problem could have major distortionary effects for the sector overall. I understand that experts in the USA and in Europe are working hard on these issues at this very moment. We heard at a recent aid agency meeting that DfID is making progress in the development of its performance-based aid instrument. We sincerely wish them success.

Three points of criticism

I do not, of course, agree with everything Leroy states in his piece. More specifically, as far the health sector is concerned, I would like to raise three key issues.

First, I think it’s important to make the distinction between performance-based aid and performance-based financing (PBF) at the country level. PBA entails a contract between a donor and a recipient country. PBF, on the other hand, is about institutional arrangements (and involves thus much more than just a contract!) mainly between a central government (for example the Ministry of Health) and health care facilities. Some commentators confound the two strategies. That’s a mistake.

I would encourage Mr Leroy to read up on recent PBF experiences in the health sector. He will notice that a whole community of experts and actors is increasingly involved in this approach, and that PBF typically entails broad institutional changes, with a view to the long term. We invite him to visit the health sector in Rwanda for example, or Burundi, where he will see first hand how transformative PBF can be. He will also see how PBF can put pressure on donors to harmonize their interventions and can increase government ownership (if donors are willing to comply with the Paris Declaration, which is of course not always the case).

Secondly, let’s not discard the New Public Management agenda so easily (as Leroy seems to do). Many low-income countries do need such reforms for their public sector. As with any reformist agenda, mistakes have certainly been made and will be made again. But it is not because, let’s say, the financial incentive scheme set up by Sarkozy for the French police is controversial that  health care facilities in sub-Saharan Africa shouldn’t be remunerated according to the services (both in terms of quantity and quality) they provide to society. Evidence (or opinions) gathered in other sectors, in other times and in totally different settings do not naturally hold in other circumstances.

This brings me straight to my third point of criticism – which I see as most important. It is a huge mistake to see the agenda of ‘results for money’ as being predominantly driven by the North and the “usual donor suspects”. Just read the viewpoint of Donald Kaberuka, President of the African Development Bank and former Minister of Finance of Rwanda, published two weeks ago in The Lancet. Some of you may not know Mr Kaberuka; he is arguably one of the most active and committed reformers in Africa today. The major progress achieved in Rwanda over the last decade is not only a story of political leadership at the highest level, but also one of getting reforms ‘technically’ right. While Paul Kagame has been a key figure, a lot of the progress in Rwanda has come about because of the commitment of a whole generation of dedicated and visionary Rwandan technicians. Some are still in the country; others, like Mr. Kaberuka, are now sharing their experience and vision at the regional level.

As you might expect from somebody in his position, Mr. Kaberuka’s paper is short and focused. The main message is straightforward: thanks to economic growth, African countries can expect to have more and more domestic resources in the near future. What they need most now is accountability. While the author displays a broad understanding of the concept (including democracy) in his paper, he also emphasizes what accountability means from a public finance perspective: public money bringing more benefits to citizens. Mr. Kaberuka’s track record and his paper give a clear indication of the policy he has in mind, and PBF is part of the package.

Is this just the vision of a successful ex-Minister of Finance, one might wonder? At a workshop organized by the World Bank in Limbe (Cameroun) two weeks ago on PBF in the health sector, I took note – again – of how important this agenda of greater accountability is for many senior African officials and technicians (although the sample was of course biased). My point is this - the accountability agenda formulated so eloquently by Mr. Kaberuka and others is not something imposed from outside.

A double proposal

In conclusion, PBA is high on the agenda in the North, and will likely remain so in the coming years. Some Western aid experts are voicing concerns. In his post, Mr. Leroy rightly raises the question of the ‘agency’ of the party under contract. Will PBA fully respect the sovereignty of the recipient country, or will it be yet another tool for donors to impose their own objectives and preferences? I may be naïve, but my guess is that the donors testing out this strategy will aim for a fair and balanced negotiation with the recipient country. But will this be enough to diminish the deep distrust that some stakeholders have developed toward bilateral aid agencies?

I have two constructive proposals for donors working with PBA.

First, it is critical to get recipient countries’ perspective on PBA. It would be great if the consultation was transparent (maybe it is in some places, but I am not aware of it). Why not organize some rounds of structured discussions with a few parliaments in the South? As we are reminded by Kaberuka and Leroy, accountability should be directed first of all towards citizens of the recipient countries. I hope that PBA can perform better than existing aid instruments in this respect.

If such a stakeholder consultation process is not possible, another option would be to suggest the PBA strategy first to Rwanda. After the summit in Busan, we know that this would be a sure way to get the perspective of African leaders on this aid instrument (at least of the most vocal one). 

For our part, we will ensure that the Financing Health in Africa blog serves as a platform for African experts to share their views and observations on PBA; communities of practice can  play a role in this drive for more accountability.

The second proposal is to correctly identify what success looks like under PBA contracts. I would argue that the main test will not be whether PBA manages to curb the HIV/AIDS epidemic or maternal mortality (although these would be great feats of course). The real test for PBA will be whether such schemes consolidate country-owned agendas for accountability or whether they undermine them. In this respect, the way PBA relates to different reforms enhancing accountability in the health sector (see the list proposed by Donald Kaberuka) will be the key.

9 Commentaires
Kristof Decoster
12/15/2011 08:07:29 am

If ‘value for money’ is increasingly an African agenda as well, it will be interesting to see to what extent civil society, ngo’s, beneficiaries, sociologists, antropologists, philosophers, … welcome Performance-Based Aid in the years to come (how was the stance of civil society in Busan on PBA for example?). Accountability seems linked to “democratic” ownership (especially since Busan). You cannot just listen to MoF officials, health economists, donor organisation & aid technocrats and decision makers … and conclude it’s a widely shared African agenda. I’m far from an expert, but from a distance the PBA agenda still seems predominantly a technocratic one. No marches yet from activists for example (like the HIV activists did at ICASA, or climate activists in Durban).

Répondre
Bruno Meessen
12/15/2011 08:30:53 am

Thanks Kristof. This is exactly my point!

Citizens from Belgium, Egypt, Senegal or Brazil are all expecting high quality services from the public services funded with the taxes they pay. The demand for accountability/results is not a question at their level. Pretty clear in the Arabic world in 2010!


Let's not equate the 'value for money' agenda with PBA. This exactly my point in the blog . Ill-designed / too technocratic PBA could indeed go against accountability to citizens.


Now, you may mean: how does the population perceive schemes like PBF? The truth is that the reforms PBF conveys are rather complex and not easy to share with the general population. What matters for households is the quality of the services they receive when they visit the health centre. The fact that utilisation is usually surging after the introduction of a PBF scheme is a first indication that people appreciate the change in behaviors by the health staff.




Répondre
Kristof Decoster
12/15/2011 08:55:36 am

OK, let’s focus on PBF for example. I was just wondering whether civil society all over the world (including in the developing world) is not more in favour of decent wages and work conditions for everybody, rather than for performance-related arrangements to make workers perform. I remember a Cambodian social scientist saying, when I mentioned PBF to him: “It’s just a matter of paying people decent wages and providing with stable work conditions and a feasible workload. Then they will perform. Not the other way around.”

I would be interested in the view of the ILO and African trade unions for example on this. See for example Oxfam’s Duncan Green’s view on the upcoming (2013) World Development Report on jobs and why he’s worried about its (likely) one-sidedness. The debate is somewhat similar. (see http://www.oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/?p=7961 )

Répondre
Marcus Leroy
12/28/2011 02:18:09 am

I sincerely thank Bruno Meessen (BM) for his reaction to my “value for money” paper. I react in 4 points, each time briefly repeating my views and then indicating how this relates to BM’s reaction.

1. The gist of my paper is that the use of performance indicators in societal processes tends to ignore the essence of what human development really is, and therefore carries a heavy risk of pernicious effects.
Though my paper describes the unwarranted use of “value for money” as a shortcoming of donors, there is, obviously, no reason to believe that the said pernicious effects are contingent on the actor. In other words, whether or not “value for money” is (also) an African agenda has by itself no effect on the value of my argument.

2. The idea that development objectives can be translated into rational deliverables and that results can be judged independently from the underlying ideology is a delusion, my paper contends.
The somewhat ironic way BM relegates “philosophical and moral issues” to “another blog” does not put my mind at rest. It leads me to fear that the allure of a reductionist, technocratic approach is never far away.

3. My paper argues that “counting and measuring” should be part of a dynamic and interactive process aiming at fundamental long-term objectives as fairness, accountability and participation.
BM’s repeated emphasis on accountability gives me the impression that at least on that aspect he largely concurs with my point. On the other hand it must be underlined that even if donors have “balanced negotiations with the recipient country” as BM hopes, the question of representativity, fairness and participation remains unanswered.

4. The policy documents and the field evidence I have knowledge of – admittedly a narrow selection of the whole, and all of them donor documents – do not reassure me that the pernicious effects I describe will be avoided.
BM seems to feel that performance-based remuneration schemes, notably in Rwanda and Burundi, mostly avoid the pitfalls I have pointed out. These schemes, he says, are transformative and they support broader institutional changes. I honestly welcome this and I have no ground whatsoever to refute his assertions. I can only hope they also comply with the values mentioned in point 3 above.

To end on a lighter note, I particularly welcome BM’s kind invitation for me to visit the health sector in Rwanda or Burundi. So, I’m looking forward, not only to continue this debate but also to receiving the practicalities of his invitation.

Marcus Leroy, 28-12-11

Répondre
Bruno Meessen
1/4/2012 02:39:33 pm

Mr Leroy, thanks for your reaction to my blog. My intention was certainly not to relegate philosophical and moral dimensions as secondary questions. I do believe that performance-based financing, as it is being developed currently in sub-Saharan Africa, is compatible with liberal theories of justice. I promise that I will come back on this in another post.

I also believe that any advanced discussion on any aid instrument is technocratic to some extent. A collective challenge for all aid actors is to bring such discussions in democratic arena, especially those of recipient countries. This is the spirit of our recommendation to involve parliaments in the consultation process on performance-based aid.

I am not an aid expert, but this discussion makes me think that it would be interesting to identify a few metrics / principles to comparatively review different aid instruments. Obviously, 'result for money' aka as 'efficiency' will be one of them. But I agree that there are other important dimensions and that performance-based aid could score low on some of them. This is an important discussion which deserves to be developed. We hope that it will partly take place on this forum.













Répondre
Bruno Meessen
1/5/2012 02:56:44 pm

I share with you this interesting information from the Global Development blog.

'MPs say Britain should use aid to press for good governance'... with a reference to Rwanda.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/global-development/2012/jan/05/mps-britain-aid-press-transparency-governance?CMP=twt_fd

Anyone willing to react?

Répondre
james clara
6/28/2020 01:03:08 pm

PERFECT NATURAL HERBS AND VEGANS CURE FOR Herpes 1&2 THAT WORK FAST WITHIN 14 DAYS WITH DR ELINFOH HERBAL MEDICINE, I saw so many testimonies about Dr ELINFOH a great HERBAL DOCTOR that will help you CURE and give you the rightful health to live a joyful life, i didn't believe it at first, but as the pain got worsen and my life was at risk after using lots of ARV drugs from the hospital and no changes so i decided to give a try to Dr Elinfoh I contacted him also and told him i want a cure for Herpes , he gave me advice on what i must do and he deliver it to me in my home address i gave him and i got the medicine which i use according to his instruction, and today i must say I am so grateful to this man Dr Elinfoh for curing me from Herpes and for restoring me back to my normal health and a sound life and i am making this known to every one out there who have been trying all day to be cured from Herpes or any sickness should not waste more time just contact him with his details below, believe me this is the only way to get cured from Hepres , this is the real solution we all have been searching for. Do not waste more time contacting him today for you can also leave a sound and happy life. contact info below. Email: ([email protected] ) or WhatsApp or Call him on: +2348110492072. and you can as well contact him on other issues you are having like*HEPATITIS B*DIABETICS*CANCER*ALS*HERPES*BODY REDUCTION*BREAST ENLARGEMENT*FIBROD*CANCER*PREGNANCY MISCARRIAGE*Relationship issues etc.. ** Neoplasms*Cardiovascular Disease (CVD)
*Chronic Respiratory Diseases
* Mental and Behavioral Disorders
*Alzheimer’s Disease
Email: ([email protected]).    
Via whatsapp +2348110492072. I pray God also blesses you with your heart's desire as you get in touch with Dr Elinfoh.

Répondre
Rachel Frye
12/9/2023 03:38:09 am

Hello, my name is Rachel Frye and I want to give this testimony in respect of Dr. Odunga who made me win $2 Million Dollars in Lottery by matching the 5 numbers for me. I am happy to be out of financial debt and be able to help my family in these seasonal period of fun and cheer. I contacted Dr. Odunga through Whats-App (+2348167159012) when I told him to help me win the Mega Millions and He told me that it would be spiritually checked if I will win the Lottery. When he informed me that I will not be able to win the Jackpot but I will win huge amount in the lottery I was not completely sad but had great faith in him. I live in Freeland, Saginaw County, Michigan and I would say it was pretty hard to send him the money for the spell before he gave me the winning numbers to play. He sent me the numbers and I played. The next morning after the drawing, I matched the five white balls in the Aug. 4 drawing to win $1 million: 11-30-45-52-56. Thanks to the Megaplier X2, my prize was multiplied to $2 million. Thank You Dr Odunga for this wonderful experience with you. You too can contact Dr. Odunga at his Whats-App +2348167159012 or Email: [email protected]

Répondre
moupay martins
11/29/2024 06:03:02 pm

I was heartbroken because I had a very small manhood , not nice to satisfy a woman, I had so many relationships cut off because of my situation, I have used so many products which i found online but none could offer me the help I searched for. I saw some comments about this specialist called Dr Moses Buba and decided to email him at [email protected] so I decided to give his herbal product a try. i emailed him and he got back to me, he gave me some comforting words with his herbal pills for manhood Enlargement, Within 14days of it, i began to feel the enlargement of my manhood , " and now it just 2 weeks of using his products my manhood is about 9 inches longer and i am so happy, contact DR Moses Buba now via email [email protected] or his WhatsApp number +2349060529305 . contact him through his Facebook page : https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61559577240930 may God reward you for your good work . For more info i can help to explain the medication +44 7375301397

HE ALSO RENDERED THE FOLLOWING ........1. BRING YOUR EX BACK........... 2. LOTTERY SPELL......... 3. PREGNANCY SPELL ..........4. WEAK ERECTION ............5. POOR EJACULATION..........

Répondre



Laisser un réponse.


    Our websites

    Photo
    Photo
    Photo

    We like them...

    SINA-Health
    International Health Policies
    CGD

    Archives

    Septembre 2019
    Juin 2019
    Avril 2019
    Mars 2019
    Mai 2018
    Avril 2018
    Mars 2018
    Février 2018
    Janvier 2018
    Décembre 2017
    Octobre 2017
    Septembre 2017
    Août 2017
    Juillet 2017
    Juin 2017
    Mai 2017
    Avril 2017
    Mars 2017
    Février 2017
    Janvier 2017
    Décembre 2016
    Novembre 2016
    Octobre 2016
    Septembre 2016
    Août 2016
    Juillet 2016
    Avril 2016
    Mars 2016
    Février 2016
    Janvier 2016
    Décembre 2015
    Novembre 2015
    Octobre 2015
    Septembre 2015
    Août 2015
    Juillet 2015
    Juin 2015
    Mai 2015
    Avril 2015
    Mars 2015
    Février 2015
    Janvier 2015
    Décembre 2014
    Octobre 2014
    Septembre 2014
    Juillet 2014
    Juin 2014
    Mai 2014
    Avril 2014
    Mars 2014
    Février 2014
    Janvier 2014
    Décembre 2013
    Novembre 2013
    Octobre 2013
    Septembre 2013
    Août 2013
    Juillet 2013
    Juin 2013
    Mai 2013
    Avril 2013
    Mars 2013
    Février 2013
    Janvier 2013
    Décembre 2012
    Novembre 2012
    Octobre 2012
    Septembre 2012
    Août 2012
    Juillet 2012
    Juin 2012
    Mai 2012
    Avril 2012
    Mars 2012
    Février 2012
    Janvier 2012
    Décembre 2011
    Novembre 2011
    Octobre 2011

    Tags

    Tout
    2012
    Accountability
    Aid
    Alex Ergo
    Assurance Maladie
    Bad
    Bamako Initiative
    Bénin
    Bruno Meessen
    Burkina Faso
    Burundi
    Civil Society
    Communauteacute-de-pratique
    Communauté De Pratique
    Community Of Practice
    Community Participation
    Conference
    Cop
    Course
    Couverture Universelle
    CSU
    Déclaration De Harare
    Divine Ikenwilo
    Dr Congo
    économie Politique
    élections
    équité
    Equity
    Fbp
    Financement Basé Sur Les Résultats
    Financement Public
    Fragilité
    Fragility
    Free Health Care
    Global Fund
    Global Health Governance
    Gratuité
    Gratuité
    Health Equity Fund
    Health Insurance
    ICT
    Identification Des Pauvres
    Isidore Sieleunou
    Jb Falisse
    Jurrien Toonen
    Kenya
    Knowledge-management
    Kouamé
    Leadership
    Mali
    Management
    Maroc
    Maternal And Child Health
    Médicaments
    Mise En Oeuvre
    Mutuelle
    National Health Accounts
    Ngo
    Niger
    Omd
    OMS
    Parlement
    Participation Communautaire
    Pba
    Pbf
    Plaidoyer
    Policy Process
    Politique
    Politique De Gratuité
    Politique De Gratuité
    Post Conflit
    Post-conflit
    Private Sector
    Processus Politique
    Qualité Des Soins
    Qualité Des Soins
    Quality Of Care
    Recherche
    Redevabilité
    Reform
    Réforme
    Research
    Results Based Financing
    Rwanda
    Santé Maternelle
    Secteur Privé
    Sénégal
    Société Civile
    Uganda
    Universal Health Coverage
    User Fee Removal
    Voeux 2012
    Voucher
    WHO

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.