Financing Health in Africa - Le blog
  • Home
  • Bloggers
  • Collaborative projects
  • Join our COPs
  • Resources
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Performance Based Financing: main lessons from two recent scientific studies

1/5/2015

7 Commentaires

 
Picture
Igna Bonfrer & Ellen Van de Poel

The end of 2014 has been marked by several scientific publications on the experience of Performance Based Financing (PBF) in Burundi. 
Igna Bonfrer and Ellen Van de Poel (Erasmus University Rotterdam) summarize some of the key findings of their own research. PBF brings benefits to the population, but there are still areas for improvement.

With the start of 2015, we can gear up for what promises to be an important year for international health care financing. We will see the closing of the Millennium Development Goals and the start of the Sustainable Development Goals. The latter are expected to include the aim to achieve Universal Health Coverage (UHC): providing good quality care to everyone who needs it, without causing financial hardship. PBF could be an important tool to fasten progress towards UHC by incentivizing the delivery of quality health care, but attention needs to be paid that services remain accessible for the poorest households. 

Enthusiasm for performance based financing

Over the last decade, PBF has attracted interest from policy makers across low- and middle income countries. In Africa alone, more than 
35 countries are in the process of introducing payment methods that reward performance. While there is great enthusiasm among policy makers and practitioners about the achievements of PBF, robust evidence on its effects in LMIC remains limited. We are therefore happy to share the findings of two of the recently published studies evaluating the effects of PBF in Burundi.

Evidence on its effects in Burundi

We evaluated the effects of PBF on maternal and child care utilization and quality. In 2008, PBF was introduced for a range of health care services in different pilot provinces over time and subsequently a roll-out to nationwide level took place in April 2010. We first estimated the effects of PBF in nine 
pilot provinces out of the 17 provinces in total, using data collected by the Dutch aid organization Cordaid in these nine provinces. We then used the nationally representative Burundi Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS containing data over the period 2005-2010) to estimate effects at the nationwide level from all pilot provinces and the first four to nine months of nationwide roll-out. Our data allowed us to study the initial 2.5 years of PBF in Burundi.

Promising findings from pilots but limited effects at nationwide level

The findings from the nine pilot provinces are promising but the subsequent study at nationwide level showed considerably smaller effects. Let’s take a look at some details. While in 2006, before PBF was implemented, 62 out of 100 live births took place in a health care facility, this increased with 36 percent in the nine pilot provinces as a result of the introduction of PBF. In these pilot provinces, PBF was also found to double the proportion of women reporting to use modern family planning methods, to 18 percent, which means there likely still is considerable unmet need. The overall quality score based on external audits of the structure and process quality of facilities increased with 45 percent as a result of these PBF pilots. In the nationwide study we also investigated quality of care by looking at what happened during antenatal care visits, based on mothers’ reports, and found that the behaviour of health care providers changed to become more in line with international antenatal care guidelines (blood pressure measurement and anti-tetanus vaccinations). While the improvement in the overall quality score was large and significant, this was not confirmed by self-reported patient satisfaction. We also found no sustained effects on antenatal care use, vaccinations and the use of bed nets in the pilot provinces. 

Our nationwide study using data from all provinces, confirmed some of the above findings, though effects were smaller in size. It was especially striking that the large effects on births taking place in a health care facility found in the nine pilot provinces was not replicated when making a nationwide comparison, using the BDHS data. When reducing these data to only include the nine pilot provinces, we did find a positive effect but in size this effect is only one fourth of the effect found using the data collected by Cordaid. This suggests that some of the differences in the results between both studies are driven by the selection of the nine pilot provinces: apparently improvements were easier to make in these specific pilot provinces and maybe those involved there were more motivated. However, this still does not explain the largest share of the differences in the effects in both studies. At this stage we can only guess which other factors drive the smaller effect sizes in the nationwide study. 


Initiation of care may require more effort

Overall our findings suggest that PBF has had some strong positive impacts when using the data from the nine pilot provinces but not so much when making a nationwide comparison, over the initial 2.5 years of implementation. Especially for types of care which require a behavioural change of health care workers when the patient is already in the facility we see improvements. Improvements are smaller for services which require effort from the provider to change patients’ utilization choices. Gertler & Vermeersch (
2012) also found that the Rwandan PBF programme was more successful to increase utilization of services that are under the provider’s control, rather than those that depend on patients’ choices. Initiation of care may require more effort than continuation; an initial visit could therefore in the future be rewarded with a higher payment to facilities than the follow-up visits. 

Benefits to the poor

With a supply side intervention like PBF, one of the main worries is that the poor do not benefit sufficiently. Indeed, when studying only the poorest forty percent of the population, we find in most cases that effects are similar or smaller compared to those in the general population. So far the PBF policy in Burundi did not include elements to target the poor, investments in specific strategies for this group are therefore likely to be needed to improve equity in health and health care.

Conclusion


So, does the evidence from these two studies endorse the enthusiasm for PBF in the case of Burundi? Based on the data from the nine pilot provinces where Cordaid was involved, the scientific evidence is supportive. When estimating the effects based on data from all 17 provinces, the effects of PBF on the outcomes that we have studied for the pilot period and the subsequent initial months of nationwide roll-out, are also positive in most cases but less impressive.  Our studies provide some supportive evidence for the many countries engaged in piloting PBF to sustain their efforts, but also indicate that the assumption that PBF works with any indicator requires more scrutiny and that the concern for equity should be better integrated into PBF schemes. 


7 Commentaires
Coby van der Meer
1/9/2015 03:17:49 am

Very interesting.

Répondre
Matt Jowett
6/17/2015 03:50:37 am

Hi. Is there a full report available for distribution? Thanks. Matt

Répondre
Igna Bonfrer
6/19/2015 03:33:56 pm

Dear Matt,

Thank you for your kind interest. The two studies on PBF in Burundi can be found in chapters 5 and 6 of my PhD thesis (download available on www.bmg.eur.nl/bonfrer). These studies have been published in respectively Health Affairs and Social Science & Medicine. The Powerpoint presentations of the conference organized by the Rotterdam Global Health Initiative and the Institute of Health Policy and Management (Erasmus University) on the 11th of June 2015 can be found at www.rghi.nl

Best,
Igna

Répondre
Arizona Bisexual link
2/9/2023 06:31:14 pm

Thank you for writing thhis

Répondre
Rachel Frye
12/9/2023 01:25:27 am

Hello, my name is Rachel Frye and I want to give this testimony in respect of Dr. Odunga who made me win $2 Million Dollars in Lottery by matching the 5 numbers for me. I am happy to be out of financial debt and be able to help my family in these seasonal period of fun and cheer. I contacted Dr. Odunga through Whats-App (+2348167159012) when I told him to help me win the Mega Millions and He told me that it would be spiritually checked if I will win the Lottery. When he informed me that I will not be able to win the Jackpot but I will win huge amount in the lottery I was not completely sad but had great faith in him. I live in Freeland, Saginaw County, Michigan and I would say it was pretty hard to send him the money for the spell before he gave me the winning numbers to play. He sent me the numbers and I played. The next morning after the drawing, I matched the five white balls in the Aug. 4 drawing to win $1 million: 11-30-45-52-56. Thanks to the Megaplier X2, my prize was multiplied to $2 million. Thank You Dr Odunga for this wonderful experience with you. You too can contact Dr. Odunga at his Whats-App +2348167159012 or Email: [email protected]

Répondre
Oakland Couples link
5/7/2024 06:32:35 pm

Nicce blog you have

Répondre
moupay martins
11/28/2024 09:52:21 pm

I was heartbroken because I had a very small manhood , not nice to satisfy a woman, I had so many relationships cut off because of my situation, I have used so many products which i found online but none could offer me the help I searched for. I saw some comments about this specialist called Dr Moses Buba and decided to email him at [email protected] so I decided to give his herbal product a try. i emailed him and he got back to me, he gave me some comforting words with his herbal pills for manhood Enlargement, Within 14days of it, i began to feel the enlargement of my manhood , " and now it just 2 weeks of using his products my manhood is about 9 inches longer and i am so happy, contact DR Moses Buba now via email [email protected] or his WhatsApp number +2349060529305 . contact him through his Facebook page : https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61559577240930 may God reward you for your good work . For more info i can help to explain the medication +44 7375301397

HE ALSO RENDERED THE FOLLOWING ........1. BRING YOUR EX BACK........... 2. LOTTERY SPELL......... 3. PREGNANCY SPELL ..........4. WEAK ERECTION ............5. POOR EJACULATION..........

Répondre



Laisser un réponse.


    Our websites

    Photo
    Photo
    Photo

    We like them...

    SINA-Health
    International Health Policies
    CGD

    Archives

    Septembre 2019
    Juin 2019
    Avril 2019
    Mars 2019
    Mai 2018
    Avril 2018
    Mars 2018
    Février 2018
    Janvier 2018
    Décembre 2017
    Octobre 2017
    Septembre 2017
    Août 2017
    Juillet 2017
    Juin 2017
    Mai 2017
    Avril 2017
    Mars 2017
    Février 2017
    Janvier 2017
    Décembre 2016
    Novembre 2016
    Octobre 2016
    Septembre 2016
    Août 2016
    Juillet 2016
    Avril 2016
    Mars 2016
    Février 2016
    Janvier 2016
    Décembre 2015
    Novembre 2015
    Octobre 2015
    Septembre 2015
    Août 2015
    Juillet 2015
    Juin 2015
    Mai 2015
    Avril 2015
    Mars 2015
    Février 2015
    Janvier 2015
    Décembre 2014
    Octobre 2014
    Septembre 2014
    Juillet 2014
    Juin 2014
    Mai 2014
    Avril 2014
    Mars 2014
    Février 2014
    Janvier 2014
    Décembre 2013
    Novembre 2013
    Octobre 2013
    Septembre 2013
    Août 2013
    Juillet 2013
    Juin 2013
    Mai 2013
    Avril 2013
    Mars 2013
    Février 2013
    Janvier 2013
    Décembre 2012
    Novembre 2012
    Octobre 2012
    Septembre 2012
    Août 2012
    Juillet 2012
    Juin 2012
    Mai 2012
    Avril 2012
    Mars 2012
    Février 2012
    Janvier 2012
    Décembre 2011
    Novembre 2011
    Octobre 2011

    Tags

    Tout
    2012
    Accountability
    Aid
    Alex Ergo
    Assurance Maladie
    Bad
    Bamako Initiative
    Bénin
    Bruno Meessen
    Burkina Faso
    Burundi
    Civil Society
    Communauteacute-de-pratique
    Communauté De Pratique
    Community Of Practice
    Community Participation
    Conference
    Cop
    Course
    Couverture Universelle
    CSU
    Déclaration De Harare
    Divine Ikenwilo
    Dr Congo
    économie Politique
    élections
    équité
    Equity
    Fbp
    Financement Basé Sur Les Résultats
    Financement Public
    Fragilité
    Fragility
    Free Health Care
    Global Fund
    Global Health Governance
    Gratuité
    Gratuité
    Health Equity Fund
    Health Insurance
    ICT
    Identification Des Pauvres
    Isidore Sieleunou
    Jb Falisse
    Jurrien Toonen
    Kenya
    Knowledge-management
    Kouamé
    Leadership
    Mali
    Management
    Maroc
    Maternal And Child Health
    Médicaments
    Mise En Oeuvre
    Mutuelle
    National Health Accounts
    Ngo
    Niger
    Omd
    OMS
    Parlement
    Participation Communautaire
    Pba
    Pbf
    Plaidoyer
    Policy Process
    Politique
    Politique De Gratuité
    Politique De Gratuité
    Post Conflit
    Post-conflit
    Private Sector
    Processus Politique
    Qualité Des Soins
    Qualité Des Soins
    Quality Of Care
    Recherche
    Redevabilité
    Reform
    Réforme
    Research
    Results Based Financing
    Rwanda
    Santé Maternelle
    Secteur Privé
    Sénégal
    Société Civile
    Uganda
    Universal Health Coverage
    User Fee Removal
    Voeux 2012
    Voucher
    WHO

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.