Financing Health in Africa - Le blog
  • Home
  • Bloggers
  • Collaborative projects
  • Join our COPs
  • Resources
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Peer-to-peer learning in global health: where are all the women?

7/4/2016

1 Commentaire

 
Picture
​Allison Gamble Kelley
 
The HHA CoPs are launching an ambitious new working group to tackle a nagging problem – too few women participating actively in peer-to-peer learning.
 






Having been in global health for some 20 years now, I have worked with many strong and inspiring women colleagues at all levels – global health is literally full of them. And yet, I feel increasingly frustrated by the “maleness” of it all.

 
It seems I am not alone: from the petition to end all-male panels (bizarrely, a movement led by men) to the new sustainable development goals (all of which have some focus on progress for women), to Melinda Gates’ initiative to close the data gap on women, there is widespread acknowledgement that gender equality is both desirable and fundamentally necessary to progress, but that we are not doing an adequate job to get there. And yet, we listen to the same men speak at conference after conference…
 
Quite recently, I was a participant in a national workshop in a West African country, and when it came time for group work, a familiar scenario unfolded. The group had to nominate a president and a rapporteur. Without any discussion or hesitation, the youngest woman (one of very few women participants in the overall workshop. I’ll let you guess what the profile of the president was) was informed she would be the rapporteur. She did not protest. Over the rest of the afternoon, several loquacious and supremely confident men would do most of the talking, while she would attempt to capture and distill (usually unsuccessfully) some “key points” for the report-out from their gab. The result was something less than ideal.
 
Men seem to occupy significantly more air time than women when it comes to global and national health fora – let’s call it a participation gap.
 
CoPs to the rescue?
 
Some years back I became rather disaffected by the “global health stratosphere” and the development partner project model and I became a proponent of the (at-the-time) rather new approach to collaborative learning and south-south networks. In the HHA Communities of Practice I have been facilitating since 2010, the focus is explicitly on bringing forth and sharing individual expertise (irrespective of institutional affiliation or rank, nor of course gender) and encouraging a younger generation of African experts to work differently. These communities of practice emphasize community and are non-hierarchical. They focus on continuous learning using evidence and sharing experience to find operational solutions to daily health systems challenges. We have been free to experiment and evolve based on experience and results.
 
And yet, even in this rather unconventional setting, even with the younger generation, I continue to observe the participation gap: men dominate CoP activities as well. With the exception of the role of CoP facilitator (where there is more or less parity), male expert members are more numerous than female. Men participate more in CoP collaborative projects, in workshops, in writing articles, and seemingly also in on-line exchanges. I got to asking myself, why is the participation of women experts in our CoPs so timid?
 
Interestingly, Wikipedia has faced a similar challenge when it comes to women’s participation. In 2011, only 9% of contributions globally were from women. Despite several initiatives to correct this bias, the organization has failed to meet its goal of increasing women’s participation to 25% by 2015. A Harvard Business Review article on the Wikipedia experience sums up the stakes: “The gender gap issue matters for several reasons. From a pure content perspective, men and women may bring different interests and preferences, and they may focus on different issues. If we have such a small percentage of women contributing, then there are a lot of issues that will potentially be skewed or get less attention than they should.” (1) 
 
No Time to waste, join us !

We feel that this analysis also applies to our CoPs, and we plan to do something about it. Our experience leads us to believe that peer-to-peer learning will play an increasingly important role in knowledge management for global health, as well as in the development of individual experts’ careers. Thus the gender gap we observe is problematic, and the time to act is now. So in July, we will launch a working group, “Peer-to-peer learning in global health: where are all the women?” The idea is to bring together a small group of CoP members to document and analyse the current situation, and to try to get to the bottom of the participation gap…The composition of the group will be majority women, but we hope to have several (enlightened) men as well.
 
Participation in this working group is open. If you are interested, you will find more information as well as the link to apply here. You will also be one of the first to discover Collectivity, a new collaborative platform we are in the process of building. Be aware that this group will be capped at 12 people for efficiency’s sake. So hurry and make your case for participation; we expect we will have to turn some away…
 
One of the tasks of this working group will be to develop an on-line survey, and  we count on your responses to it. In the Fall, based on our analysis, we will be proposing some solutions to begin to close the gender participation gap in our CoPs. We recognize that the problem will not be solved in just a few months, but we are motivated and ambitious. Perhaps there will be some broader lessons for global health collaboration?
 

Footnote:
(1) “Why do so few women edit Wikipedia,” Nicole Torres, Harvard Business Review, June 2016

1 Commentaire
SEMLALI
7/4/2016 01:20:37 pm

Merci Allison

Très bonne initiative pour concrétiser le droit des femmes de s'exprimer d'avantage dans un milieu de travail qui, de plus en plus, leur revient par nature.

Allez les femmes adhérer et exprimer vous

Hassan

Répondre



Laisser un réponse.


    Our websites

    Photo
    Photo
    Photo

    We like them...

    SINA-Health
    International Health Policies
    CGD

    Archives

    Septembre 2019
    Juin 2019
    Avril 2019
    Mars 2019
    Mai 2018
    Avril 2018
    Mars 2018
    Février 2018
    Janvier 2018
    Décembre 2017
    Octobre 2017
    Septembre 2017
    Août 2017
    Juillet 2017
    Juin 2017
    Mai 2017
    Avril 2017
    Mars 2017
    Février 2017
    Janvier 2017
    Décembre 2016
    Novembre 2016
    Octobre 2016
    Septembre 2016
    Août 2016
    Juillet 2016
    Avril 2016
    Mars 2016
    Février 2016
    Janvier 2016
    Décembre 2015
    Novembre 2015
    Octobre 2015
    Septembre 2015
    Août 2015
    Juillet 2015
    Juin 2015
    Mai 2015
    Avril 2015
    Mars 2015
    Février 2015
    Janvier 2015
    Décembre 2014
    Octobre 2014
    Septembre 2014
    Juillet 2014
    Juin 2014
    Mai 2014
    Avril 2014
    Mars 2014
    Février 2014
    Janvier 2014
    Décembre 2013
    Novembre 2013
    Octobre 2013
    Septembre 2013
    Août 2013
    Juillet 2013
    Juin 2013
    Mai 2013
    Avril 2013
    Mars 2013
    Février 2013
    Janvier 2013
    Décembre 2012
    Novembre 2012
    Octobre 2012
    Septembre 2012
    Août 2012
    Juillet 2012
    Juin 2012
    Mai 2012
    Avril 2012
    Mars 2012
    Février 2012
    Janvier 2012
    Décembre 2011
    Novembre 2011
    Octobre 2011

    Tags

    Tout
    2012
    Accountability
    Aid
    Alex Ergo
    Assurance Maladie
    Bad
    Bamako Initiative
    Bénin
    Bruno Meessen
    Burkina Faso
    Burundi
    Civil Society
    Communauteacute-de-pratique
    Communauté De Pratique
    Community Of Practice
    Community Participation
    Conference
    Cop
    Course
    Couverture Universelle
    CSU
    Déclaration De Harare
    Divine Ikenwilo
    Dr Congo
    économie Politique
    élections
    équité
    Equity
    Fbp
    Financement Basé Sur Les Résultats
    Financement Public
    Fragilité
    Fragility
    Free Health Care
    Global Fund
    Global Health Governance
    Gratuité
    Gratuité
    Health Equity Fund
    Health Insurance
    ICT
    Identification Des Pauvres
    Isidore Sieleunou
    Jb Falisse
    Jurrien Toonen
    Kenya
    Knowledge-management
    Kouamé
    Leadership
    Mali
    Management
    Maroc
    Maternal And Child Health
    Médicaments
    Mise En Oeuvre
    Mutuelle
    National Health Accounts
    Ngo
    Niger
    Omd
    OMS
    Parlement
    Participation Communautaire
    Pba
    Pbf
    Plaidoyer
    Policy Process
    Politique
    Politique De Gratuité
    Politique De Gratuité
    Post Conflit
    Post-conflit
    Private Sector
    Processus Politique
    Qualité Des Soins
    Qualité Des Soins
    Quality Of Care
    Recherche
    Redevabilité
    Reform
    Réforme
    Research
    Results Based Financing
    Rwanda
    Santé Maternelle
    Secteur Privé
    Sénégal
    Société Civile
    Uganda
    Universal Health Coverage
    User Fee Removal
    Voeux 2012
    Voucher
    WHO

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.