Financing Health in Africa - Le blog
  • Home
  • Bloggers
  • Collaborative projects
  • Join our COPs
  • Resources
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Incentivizing Respectful Maternity Care - could PBF promote comprehensive change?

5/2/2017

8 Commentaires

 
Shannon McMahon, Christabel Kambala and Manuela De Allegri
The PBF Community of Practice is initiating a collaborative learning program on ‘PBF & Quality of Care’. Health Financing in Africa welcomes testimonies, opinion pieces and presentations of research findings. In this first blog of our series, Shannon McMahon (Heidelberg University, Germany), Christabel Kambala (College of Medicine, Malawi), and Manuela De Allegri (Heidelberg University, Germany)* present findings from two evaluations in Malawi. The authors urge that Respectful Maternal Care (RMC) attracts more attention within the PBF community, and they offer insights into how PBF programming could be used to bolster elements of RMC.

Picture

Respectful Maternity Care: status of the knowledge

Respectful Maternity Care (RMC) can be defined as the provision of dignified care to women. In recent years, the topic has featured prominently in maternal health, public health and human rights research. Literature reviews in 2010 and 2015 delineated what disrespectful care looks like. A 2016 review examined what drives disrespect in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), and several studies (including Abuya 2015 and Sando 2016) have examined the prevalence of disrespectful care during childbirth. While knowledge of the problem is extensive, insights into a solution remain limited and narrow in scope. With one notable exception, studies detailing comprehensive, system-wide solutions are nearly non-existent.


Within the Performance Based Financing (PBF) community, RMC has scarcely gathered attention. A 2017 review on quality of care in PBF programming has noted that, to date, quality indicators have been focused on equipment and infrastructure with far less attention paid to patient-provider interactions or client perceptions of care, although these latter facets are emphasized in the WHO’s 2015 “Vision of quality for pregnant women and newborns”.

We see the challenge of RMC as an opportunity for PBF, and we urge colleagues within the CoP to consider how an output-based approach might address dilemmas related to disrespectful care.

The RMC community has built a compendium of indicators that could be used to measure disrespectful or abusive care. A sampling of questions (and their broader domains) that capture facets of disrespectful care, and could be incorporated into patient surveys and patient-provider observations are presented in Box 1.

We urge the PBF community to consider whether or how indicators like these could be integrated into

BOX 1 - A sampling of indicators* (and their broader domains)
that could be used to measure Respectful Maternity Care

  1. Did a woman deliver alone (abandonment) Was a woman allowed to move about during labor (freedom of birth position)
  2. Was a woman allowed to have a labor companion of her choice present (birth companion)
  3. Did health providers discuss a patient’s private health information in a way that others could hear (confidentiality)
  4. Did health providers allow a woman to incorporate cultural practices as much as possible (cultural respect)
  5. Was a woman denied care due to race, ethnicity, age, health status, social class etc (discrimination)
  6. Was a woman or her family asked for a bribe or informal payment (bribes)
  7. Was a woman detained due to lack of payment (detention)
  8. Was a woman hit, slapped, pushed, pinched or otherwise beaten during delivery (physical abuse)
  9. Did a provider scold, shout at or insult a woman (verbal abuse)
  10. Did a provider introduce him/herself to a patient (politeness)
  11. Did a provider seek consent before undertaking a clinical procedure (autonomy)
  12. Did a provider explain what was being done and what to expect during labor in a manner that a woman understood (information exchange)

*Source: https://www.k4health.org/toolkits/rmc/indicators-compendium
existing quality tools (whether during community verifications or facility-based observations). Our teams at Heidelberg University and the College of Medicine have begun having this conversation internally in light of our mixed-methods evaluations of two Malawi-based PBF programs across different districts in the country: the Results Based Financing for Maternal and Newborn Health (RBF4MNH) program and the Support for Service Delivery Integration – Performance Based Incentives (SSDI-PBI) program. Each evaluation revealed problems and opportunities in relation to promoting respect in the context of PBF.

Findings from our two evaluations

In terms of documenting the problem of disrespect, our findings reflect existing RMC literature. Across evaluations, women and community leaders described overcrowding and strained or cursory patient-provider interactions that often entailed demeaning, discriminatory or harsh remarks on behalf of providers.

In both evaluations, respondents reported feeling that providers were tired or overworked, and that they looked down upon the clients they served. The RBF4MNH evaluation placed particular emphasis on maternal care during delivery. In that study, women described how providers did not explain or effectively communicate what they were doing during labor and delivery. Women said they felt ignored. In extreme cases, women described giving birth alone or in the presence of an unskilled companion such as a friend, family member, fellow laboring woman, cleaner or security guard; in three instances, women described how their newborns fell to the floor during delivery as nobody was present to catch their baby. For their part, providers described feeling overworked and undervalued.

In terms of solutions, our evaluations also uncovered reasons to feel hopeful. After three years of implementation, respondents in both evaluations described facilities as having more equipment and better infrastructure (including, in the case of RBF4MNH, enhanced visual privacy via screens); being cleaner; and having a more consistent flow of supplies. Women who sought care in RBF4MNH intervention facilities were more likely to report satisfaction with the level of confidentiality and privacy provided to them during labor and delivery than their counterparts in control facilities. Finally, in both PBF programs, respondents described sensing that the program’s inclusion of patient feedback enhanced provider accountability. In RBF4MNH, this took the form of exit interviews wherein clients were asked a series of questions regarding their encounter with providers. In SSDI-PBI, this took the form of meetings where community members and providers could air grievances and discuss solutions. Whether through exit interviews or collective forums, the process of sharing insights and solutions forced health facility staff to recognize that a patient’s experience of care matters. As one provider said, “Look, when you know you are in part being assessed based on what a woman says, you have to be nice.”

Could PBF contribute more to respectful care?

We have debated within our research team whether it may be feasible for future PBF programs to more pointedly address mistreatment, by incorporating indicators that emphasize respectful care into quantity or quality checklists. We have also posed the following question to providers ‘Could an incentive scheme that rewards respectful care spark lasting changes in provider behaviors and attitudes?’ to which providers responded with caution. Several providers noted that within any given facility there is often a “bad apple” who tarnishes the image of the facility and seems obstinate in their disrespectful approach. Other providers described how a change in incentives could lead to workarounds that don’t eliminate disrespect, but merely shift the role of who is undertaking the disrespectful behavior. For example, overstretched facility staff could recruit those who accompany women to facilities-- in-laws, sisters or mothers --to enact verbally or physically abusive behaviors toward an “uncooperative” laboring woman. We envision that there are many more unintended consequences that could erode trust even amid a well-intentioned, respectful care-focused PBF program.

Despite these challenges, we err on the side of optimism. We recognize that the current dearth of interventions addressing respect is likely linked to the fact that this problem is multi-faceted, emotionally-charged, politically sensitive, and it transcends several tiers of the health system while also demanding long-term, cross-sector collaboration. This makes promoting respect a daunting prospect, but such challenges are not new to those working within PBF.

In fact, we see several parallels between the essential ingredients of a RMC-focused program and the historical experiences of PBF programs. Do both PBF and RMC programs demand a seismic shift in the way a health system operates and views itself? Yes. Do both PBF and RMC efforts require stakeholders from across ministries and sectors to work together in heretofore unheard of ways? Yes. Are PBF and respectful care programs likely to be perceived as burdensome or problematic by providers? Yes. Is the PBF community accustomed to questions and critiques regarding sustainability and cost – perhaps more than any other health intervention in recent memory? Yes it is, and the RMC community may need to brace for this too. Finally, must both PBF and RMC programmers consider how to bring about changes that ripple through several target audiences including: individual clients, households, communities, facilities, district health management teams and multiple ministries? Yes, they do. Given these parallels, could the PBF community harness their tacit and explicit knowledge and devise novel ways to address mistreatment of women? We think so.

*The researchers are engaged in evaluations of the RBF4MNH program and the SSDI-PBI program in Malawi. These evaluations were sponsored by donors including: the governments of the United States and Norway through the USAID | TRAction Project at URC, the Royal Norwegian Embassy in Malawi, and the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad).

8 Commentaires
Olivier Inginda
5/3/2017 07:55:38 pm

Thank you for sharing the finding of this interesting evaluation.
The problem of respectful health care, especially at the maternity level, is common to most developing countries. It is a problem related to one dimension of the quality of providers, which goes beyond the level of training and qualification: basic education, gentleness. The solution to this challenge requires a real change in the behavior of health providers, a perennial sensitization, an intensive and persistent communication with a view to a change of behavior. The limit of the PBF is that it emphasizes money, both as an incentive and a catalyst for change.
Personnaly, I think it's not with financial incentives that this kind of situation can be solved because it is often the result of educational deficiencies. We must talk to health workers, to their conscience and to their inner voice so that the respect due to patiens, especially pregnant women, becomes an integral part of their personality.

The PBF can certainly help but, it is not enough. This should be combined with an ongoing program of awareness-raising and education for real change.


Olivier Ingnda

Répondre
Modestine NKIAMPILA NKOSI
5/4/2017 12:45:12 pm

Les soins maternels respectueux sont un droit humain qu’a toute femme qui fréquente le système de santé.
La démotivation des prestataires de santé n’est une cause parmi tant d’autres de cette situation dégradante de violence obstétricale dont sont victimes plusieurs femmes. L’incitation financière apportée par le PBF est la bienvenue pour réduire ce risque d’abus et améliorer la qualité des soins offerts aux femmes.
Mais cela ne suffit pas, il faut s’attaquer également au comportement passif des femmes par une sensibilisation continue sur leurs droits mais aussi une éducation des prestataires des services sur le respect des droits de la femme et l’humanisation des soins maternels (accouchement et autres).

Répondre
Amandine Oleffe
5/7/2017 06:26:41 pm

Thank you for the interesting initiative and the list of indicators which is a good attempt to capture health staff’s attitudes and behaviors in the assessment of respectful maternity care. Measuring quality of care in all its facets is a complex and challenging issue.

If PBF may help to address part of disrespectful care, I personally think the answer is to be found elsewhere. The origin of violence against pregnant women needs to be investigated in order to be addressed adequately. Providers often justify their attitude by the lack of resources or consideration, the workload or technical difficulties. But the reality is more complex.

We can ask ourselves why respect becomes a problem when it concerns the health center or the maternity. Respect is an important and rooted value in most African countries. But respect is often vertical (respect for a hierarchic superior, for elderly people, etc.) The question here is how to “horizontalize” this value in society and to bring it into healthcare facilities. In the center of the debate, there is also the superiority complex of the health care staff.

Before articulating PBF and RMC, I would recommend to continue using qualitative methods, such as in-depth interviews (mainly with providers) and participatory observation in order to understand the reason hidden behind those abuses. There are also interesting methodologies to help conflicting stakeholders to think differently the problem they face by a triangulation. These methodologies could bring an added-value in terms of trying to put one stakeholder in the place of the other, while producing interesting elements of understanding.

PBF could help to improve respectful care but we need to keep in mind that it only influences the extrinsic financial motivation of the health care staff. Respectful care also needs to be analyzed through the intrinsic motivation. I join Mr Ingnda when he underlines the importance of training and education. This is why I recommend to analyze the content of health staff’s academic training and the modalities of their on-the-job training. Dignified care should also be taken into consideration when it comes to life-long training.

Amandine Oleffe

Répondre
BABA NJIE PMO MCNHRP
5/7/2017 11:09:07 pm

Interestingly, I quite agree that RPF influences is purely influence by the monitoring value attach to whatever is to be achieve. We need to focus on the training, cadre and skill of the career for pregnant women. the environment that relates to equipment, coaching and supervisory levels within and external that can at least encourage them . For instance he same cadre working in private clinics respect this element of RMC as heavy penalties or consequences are levied upon whoever gives the care. the gap is quite clear as the one in the latter; Public facility had serious over arching structure review what goes on per service delivered. I am quite interested to dig into this aspect how to measure RMC across our care giving spectrum

Répondre
richard mugahi
5/9/2017 01:51:09 pm

Great comments, true monetary incentives have a role in PBF but its not the only factor incentivizing the supply side.For example we have collaborative learning exchange programs between a facility in Uganda with another facility in the UK and this approach is improving the quality of care and the motivation of the midwives.

Répondre
Dossou Jean-Paul
5/12/2017 01:51:15 pm

When you pay for something to get it, you make IT LEGITIMATE NOT TO have it, when you don't pay for it.

Répondre
clara james
6/28/2020 12:15:02 pm

PERFECT NATURAL HERBS AND VEGANS CURE FOR Herpes 1&2 THAT WORK FAST WITHIN 14 DAYS WITH DR ELINFOH HERBAL MEDICINE, I saw so many testimonies about Dr ELINFOH a great HERBAL DOCTOR that will help you CURE and give you the rightful health to live a joyful life, i didn't believe it at first, but as the pain got worsen and my life was at risk after using lots of ARV drugs from the hospital and no changes so i decided to give a try to Dr Elinfoh I contacted him also and told him i want a cure for Herpes , he gave me advice on what i must do and he deliver it to me in my home address i gave him and i got the medicine which i use according to his instruction, and today i must say I am so grateful to this man Dr Elinfoh for curing me from Herpes and for restoring me back to my normal health and a sound life and i am making this known to every one out there who have been trying all day to be cured from Herpes or any sickness should not waste more time just contact him with his details below, believe me this is the only way to get cured from Hepres , this is the real solution we all have been searching for. Do not waste more time contacting him today for you can also leave a sound and happy life. contact info below. Email: (drelinfohherbalhome@gmail.com ) or WhatsApp or Call him on: +2348110492072. and you can as well contact him on other issues you are having like*HEPATITIS B*DIABETICS*CANCER*ALS*HERPES*BODY REDUCTION*BREAST ENLARGEMENT*FIBROD*CANCER*PREGNANCY MISCARRIAGE*Relationship issues etc.. ** Neoplasms*Cardiovascular Disease (CVD)
*Chronic Respiratory Diseases
* Mental and Behavioral Disorders
*Alzheimer’s Disease
Email: (drelinfohherbalhome@gmail.com).    
Via whatsapp +2348110492072. I pray God also blesses you with your heart's desire as you get in touch with Dr Elinfoh.

Répondre
Martin link
3/10/2021 05:37:28 am

Very nice blog you have heree

Répondre



Laisser un réponse.


    Our websites

    Photo
    Photo
    Photo

    We like them...

    SINA-Health
    International Health Policies
    CGD

    Archives

    Septembre 2019
    Juin 2019
    Avril 2019
    Mars 2019
    Mai 2018
    Avril 2018
    Mars 2018
    Février 2018
    Janvier 2018
    Décembre 2017
    Octobre 2017
    Septembre 2017
    Août 2017
    Juillet 2017
    Juin 2017
    Mai 2017
    Avril 2017
    Mars 2017
    Février 2017
    Janvier 2017
    Décembre 2016
    Novembre 2016
    Octobre 2016
    Septembre 2016
    Août 2016
    Juillet 2016
    Avril 2016
    Mars 2016
    Février 2016
    Janvier 2016
    Décembre 2015
    Novembre 2015
    Octobre 2015
    Septembre 2015
    Août 2015
    Juillet 2015
    Juin 2015
    Mai 2015
    Avril 2015
    Mars 2015
    Février 2015
    Janvier 2015
    Décembre 2014
    Octobre 2014
    Septembre 2014
    Juillet 2014
    Juin 2014
    Mai 2014
    Avril 2014
    Mars 2014
    Février 2014
    Janvier 2014
    Décembre 2013
    Novembre 2013
    Octobre 2013
    Septembre 2013
    Août 2013
    Juillet 2013
    Juin 2013
    Mai 2013
    Avril 2013
    Mars 2013
    Février 2013
    Janvier 2013
    Décembre 2012
    Novembre 2012
    Octobre 2012
    Septembre 2012
    Août 2012
    Juillet 2012
    Juin 2012
    Mai 2012
    Avril 2012
    Mars 2012
    Février 2012
    Janvier 2012
    Décembre 2011
    Novembre 2011
    Octobre 2011

    Tags

    Tout
    2012
    Accountability
    Aid
    Alex Ergo
    Assurance Maladie
    Bad
    Bamako Initiative
    Bénin
    Bruno Meessen
    Burkina Faso
    Burundi
    Civil Society
    Communauteacute-de-pratique
    Communauté De Pratique
    Community Of Practice
    Community Participation
    Conference
    Cop
    Course
    Couverture Universelle
    CSU
    Déclaration De Harare
    Divine Ikenwilo
    Dr Congo
    économie Politique
    élections
    équité
    Equity
    Fbp
    Financement Basé Sur Les Résultats
    Financement Public
    Fragilité
    Fragility
    Free Health Care
    Global Fund
    Global Health Governance
    Gratuité
    Gratuité
    Health Equity Fund
    Health Insurance
    ICT
    Identification Des Pauvres
    Isidore Sieleunou
    Jb Falisse
    Jurrien Toonen
    Kenya
    Knowledge-management
    Kouamé
    Leadership
    Mali
    Management
    Maroc
    Maternal And Child Health
    Médicaments
    Mise En Oeuvre
    Mutuelle
    National Health Accounts
    Ngo
    Niger
    Omd
    OMS
    Parlement
    Participation Communautaire
    Pba
    Pbf
    Plaidoyer
    Policy Process
    Politique
    Politique De Gratuité
    Politique De Gratuité
    Post Conflit
    Post-conflit
    Private Sector
    Processus Politique
    Qualité Des Soins
    Qualité Des Soins
    Quality Of Care
    Recherche
    Redevabilité
    Reform
    Réforme
    Research
    Results Based Financing
    Rwanda
    Santé Maternelle
    Secteur Privé
    Sénégal
    Société Civile
    Uganda
    Universal Health Coverage
    User Fee Removal
    Voeux 2012
    Voucher
    WHO

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.